8

Tons of right wing sources reporting that NEA (National Education Association, the main US teacher's union) made 2025 plans to stop saying that Holocaust had anything to do with the Jews.

Here's a video from some Youtube channel with 2.5 million subscribers as example. Video summary states:

The National Education Association is no longer teaching American children that the Nazis killed 6 million Jews. ... NEA is advising teachers to say that "Hitler and his accomplices exterminated 'minority groups.'

6
  • 2
    I fail to see where the title and the 1st sentence of this post connect to the quoted summary. As for the latter, I would be very surprised if the NEA ever taught anyone anything (most of its affiliates might, of course). I fail to see what's false or misleading in the sentence Hitler and his accomplices exterminated 'minority groups'; it might be in context, of course. Commented yesterday
  • @FrançoisJurain - see my answer. Their official list of Holocaust victims deliberately (by actual lie via choice of words) excluded Jews.
    – user5341
    Commented yesterday
  • 4
    @user5341 no it does not exclude Jews, that is merely your demagogic malicious interpretation. What it does do is STOP the active and actual exclusion of all the other victim groups that you are used to and are here trying to assert as correct. When you google for the victim numbers of the Holocaust you get the infamous 6 million. Even though even your answer correctly states that the Nazi program killed twice that. Commented 11 hours ago
  • @QuestionablePresence says "STOP the active and actual exclusion of all the other victim groups". They aren't excluded, just less significant (statistically). The holocaust mechanism was developed for the specific purpose of eliminating the Jews. It also proved to be an effective method for handling other trouble-makers and undesirables, but Jews were by far the largest identifiable group. What the change does is obscure this direct connection, meaning the students will think the hatred was general and won't think of the obvious question, "why the Jews?". Commented 9 hours ago
  • 1
    @RayButterworth - I've been trying to tell lots of people this, including the other user: there was no change, at least not in the sense that people seem to understand. The top answer correctly says it. There was never any guidance in the handbook talking about teaching about Jews in the context of the Holocaust; moreover, this is actually the first version to have any guidance about Holocaust remembrance in the context of Jews (the bit about Holocaust remembrance and anti-Semitism), not counting a brief internal resolution related to current events in 1979 that was not reprinted.
    – Obie 2.0
    Commented 9 hours ago

2 Answers 2

41

No, Jewish people are still mentioned in relation to the Holocaust. Furthermore, that quote is something that this channel made up, does not exist in the handbook, and this "news" organization is misrepresenting the handbook/NEA, possibly due to religious/political reasons.

You can find a copy of the 2025 handbook on the internet archive, here.

References to the Holocaust in the handbook say:

The National Education Association believes that the historical events of the Holocaust must be taught to provide insight into how atrocities of this magnitude develop. The Association also believes that Holocaust education promotes human rights, prevents future genocides, and reduces doubt that these horrifying events occurred. (1981, 2019)

NEA shall promote the celebration of International Holocaust Remembrance Day on January 27 annually on its website and through other appropriate media to recognize the more than 12 million victims of the Holocaust from different faiths, ethnicities, races, political beliefs, genders, and gender identification, abilities/disabilities, and other targeted characteristics.

NEA will post the words “Stand up Against Antisemitism” circling a Jewish star on its website during the month of January in honor of Holocaust Remembrance and Jewish American Heritage Month.

I've added emphasis on the third entry. Furthermore, the President of the NEA released the following statement:

The National Education Association has opposed antisemitism throughout its history and is deeply committed to ensuring the safety and inclusion of Jewish educators and students. NEA regularly shares resources and supports educator workshops on Holocaust education, antisemitism, and ways to promote understanding of Jewish culture, heritage and history. This reflects NEA’s ongoing commitment to teach about Holocaust history and to counter the antisemitism that laid the groundwork for the systematic murder of six million Jews and the persecution and murder of millions of others by the Nazi regime. This document is not a handbook for use in the classroom, but a compilation of the more than 100 new business items adopted by NEA last year, which largely relate to the variety of materials NEA provides. These new business items also include calls to stand up against antisemitism, promote Holocaust Remembrance and education, and promote content to mark Jewish American Heritage Month.


Let's examine the quote in your question. The full line the guest said is:

They're (NEA) saying that Hitler and his accomplices exterminated minority groups, without emphasizing the centrality of the Jews to the Holocaust.

So, it seems like their complaint isn't that NEA is planning on never talking about Jewish people in the Holocaust, but rather that the handbook gives a broad description without specifically mentioning Jewish people in this one section.


Now, three seconds into the video in the question, I paused to ask "Who are CBN News, and is it possible that they have a personal stake in this issue?" It turns out that CBN News is:

an American Conservative Christian, pro-Israel media production and distribution organization.

So, they clearly have a personal stake in this, and may not be objective reporters. There are a few indicators in this video that they have a personal bias against the NEA, so it is possible that they are making these false/misleading campaigns in order to rile people up over the organization.

Right at the start, they say:

"America's largest teachers' union, which advocated for closing classrooms and masking students during the Covid pandemic is now rewriting history."

Why would they mention Covid response in relation to a video about the Holocaust? Some quick googling shows that they were against lockdowns and masking during the pandemic, so this is likely to cast aspersion of the NEA for their viewers.

They describe the NEA as being:

A left-wing political arm that cares more about Palestine than phonics. It cares more about distinguishing anti-Zionism from antisemitism than it does making sure children are getting a quality education.

The section of the handbook which they are describing is this:

NEA will use existing digital communication tools to educate members about the difference between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.

Which just boils down to "We will educate people about the difference between opposing Jewish nationalism and opposing people for following Jewish faith."

CBN further claims that the NEA is revising history in the way the handbook addresses the formation of Israel, which the handbook describes as:

NEA will use existing digital communication tools to educate members and the general public about the history of the Palestinian Nakba. The Nakba, meaning “catastrophe” in Arabic, refers to the forced, violent displacement and dispossession of at least 750,000 Palestinians from their homeland in 1948 during the establishment of the state of Israel. Educating about the Nakba is essential for understanding the Palestinian diaspora narrative and experience, including the ongoing trauma of our Palestinian American students today. Teaching about the Nakba fosters critical thinking and empathy among students, promoting a deeper understanding of historical injustices and their contemporary ramifications.


That's only the first third of the video, but they continue to take shots at NEA, the American education system, and Palestinians. Overall, this is a clearly biased and disingenuous group who are making bad faith arguments because they're upset that the NEA are discussing ideas that they don't like, and are trying to gain sympathy for their message by pretending that the NEA is attempting to downplay the atrocities committed against the Jewish people during the Holocaust. This is a clickbait video, already gaining 46K views in two days. The claims that they are making about NEA range from mischaracterized to flat out wrong. It is clear that they are pushing a religious message, and possibly a political message related to the current US Administrations efforts to weaken/abolish the Department of Education.


Update 1:

Even the 2007 and 2011 editions of the handbook don't mention Jewish people when talking about the Holocaust, but obviously it's a subject which has been taught in America, and people are well aware of the atrocities committed against the Jewish people.

The most recent edition which I could find is from 1979.

I think that this should be proof enough that the NEA did not "remove connection of Jews to Holocaust in its 2025 plans". It hasn't been in their books for a long time, it not being in their handbook has not erased the connection of Jews to the Holocaust, adding a new statement which is broad and doesn't specifically mention any one group is not erasure of a specific group.

13
  • 7
    Can you please explain to those of us unfamiliar with the US education system, why the teaching curriculum is being set by the teacher's union? Isn't that the bailiwick of the Department of Education?
    – Oddthinking
    Commented yesterday
  • 11
    @Oddthinking I don't see anywhere in this answer that claims curriculum is being set by the teachers union. Like other unions, the NEA acts also as a professional organization and expresses political opinions relevant to the profession, not just specifically to labor issues (wages, benefits, working hours, etc). This answer is describing what the NEA says curriculum should be, not that they are setting it. Commented yesterday
  • 8
    @Oddthinking In the US, school curricula are set at the state and local levels, not nationally. While the federal government may condition subsidies on some general guidelines and goals (e.g. the "No Child Left Behind Act" during the GW Bush administration), it doesn't address curriculum details.
    – Barmar
    Commented yesterday
  • 2
    @AndrewHenle Nobody here is denying the genocide of 6 million Jewish people. Not even the NEA is denying it. But the handbook is an internal document for teachers to summarize new information being added this year, not the entirety of the lesson plan for students. CBN is acting as if NEA is handing this document to students and leaving it at that, when in reality the lesson plans will surely include detail such as what you are providing, because it is well established information. If someone said "My new phone has ChatGPT", would you get mad at them for not mentioning it has cameras? Commented yesterday
  • 6
    @Oddthinking The curriculum is not being set by NEA. As the president of NEA said, "This document is not a handbook for use in the classroom, but a compilation of the more than 100 new business items adopted by NEA last year". It's not a lesson plan, it's more like a change log of what curriculum has been set. Commented yesterday
-14

The existing answer deliberately ignored the most relevant portion of the document, so I will answer what my own research showed since posting:

The 2025 Handbook - which was adopted by NEA convention - contains the following information about Holocaust it promotes. Not information about Holocaust related plans, but about Holocaust itself:

83. International Holocaust Remembrance Day NEA shall promote the celebration of International Holocaust Remembrance Day on January 27 annually on its website and through other appropriate media to recognize the more than 12 million victims of the Holocaust from different faiths, ethnicities, races, political beliefs, genders, and gender identification, abilities/disabilities, and other targeted characteristics.

Now, that's a lot of words listing the victims, but I'm sure even a 3rd grader can notice one peculiar omission. NO JEWS ARE MENTIONED. NOT ONCE.

Oh, and let's zero in on one item: "Different faiths". Because clearly Hitler set out to kill Muslims... oh right he was allied to them and best buddies with Mufti of Jerusalem, the founder of palestinian nationalist movement and its most important leader. And since Nazis never killed Christians merely for being Christian, this is a deliberate lie, not just an inclusive wording

I'll skip the rest of antisemitic tripe in that document as not relevant to the specific question I had, but it does provide very relevant context.

12
  • 7
    You are cherry-picking a single paragraph that is also present in the other answer and includes additional paragraphs that include more information.. It isn't logical for them to only mention one of the many groups that got targeted during this time in that single paragraph.
    – Joe W
    Commented yesterday
  • 7
    The Nazis killed "Jews" even when they were already Christians (or atheists) for generations, and killed people for other reasons regardless of their faith. So in a summary "from different faiths" is still correct, but it should of course be noted that Jews were the biggest group persecuted. (And generally the genocide of Jews is what is called "Holocaust".) Commented yesterday
  • 14
    Did you write your question with this conclusion already in mind? From the way your answer is written, it sounds like you've ignored the other answer. You're presenting the same bad faith argument as CBN in saying "No Jews are mentioned once! (in this short paragraph, which is only one of the places that talks about the Holocaust)". You come across as disingenuous. Commented yesterday
  • 11
    You're right, Jews are not mentioned. Neither the non-Jewish Slavs (up to 7.5M victims), the Romani (30% to 50% of their total number? hard to tell), the Christian clergy, the mentally retarded,... the list would go on ad nauseam. What is your point? That the only crime of the Nazis was to kill Jews - sorry, JEWS - by reason of their religion? Commented 23 hours ago
  • 15
    This question and answer looks far more like political posturing than a good faith examination, especially given the author's comment on the other answer. Commented 21 hours ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.